Take the First Step: (770) 817-0711

Blog

Aging Lowers the Body’s Tolerance to Alcohol

NIH Senior Health, USA has released a report specifically tailored to the topic of alcohol use among older adults (65+). The report explains the health risks involved  such as precautions for people who shouldn’t drink while taking certain prescription medications. The report also includes information on the increase risk of substance abuse and how rehabilitation help can be found for those who develop a problem.

The report revealed that some older adults whose drinking habits have remained consistent over the years, even decades, may find that they develop problems as they get older. This is due to the fact that aging lowers the body’s tolerance for alcohol. Because of this, Dr. Kenneth Warren, acting director of NIH’s National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, says, “older adults may experience the effects of alcohol, such as slurred speech or lack of coordination, more quickly than when they were younger.”

This is because as the human body gets older its ability to metabolize or break down alcohol becomes slower. Thus it stays in the body longer than it does a younger human body. As a result, this increases an older adult’s sensitivity to the effects of alcohol. For example a senior male of the same weight as a younger male will have a higher percentage of alcohol in his blood after they both consume a glass of wine. One explanation for this, is that the amount of water in the body lowers as we age.

Because an older adult may be more sensitive to the effects of drinking, their risk for alcohol abuse also increases. Alcohol use can also become problematic for older adults if they are taking certain prescription medications or have certain existing health conditions, such as diabetes, hypertension/high blood pressure, liver problems, etc, which alcohol use can exacerbate.

Efforts to Control the Problem of Pain Killers

As reported by The New York Times, Washington State is the first of hopefully many that is making a sweeping attempt to control the abuse of pain killers. The state government is developing regulations meant to stop doctors from prescribing higher doses of powerful painkillers for patients who are not benefiting from them.

Among other regulations, Washington would be the first state to require doctors to refer patients on escalating doses of pain killers for evaluation by a third party if they are not improving. This comes as a response to the national epidemic of excessive use of pain killers such as OxyContin, fentanyl and methadone that has resulted in abuse as well as fatalities due to overdose.

Pain specialists in Washington State say this move is essential in light of doctors giving high daily dosages of powerful and dangerous drugs for ailments like back pain for a long period of time without evidence that the drugs are benefiting the patient.

On a national scale, prescription drug overdoses are the second-leading cause of accidental death behind car accidents, and in some states, they are the leading cause of death, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Washington State’s efforts reflect a growing view that current procedures of prescribing and utilizing pain medications must change. With the exception of cancer and end-of-life patients, many question just how beneficial pain medications are for most patients. In fact increasing evidence from studies, including one from Washington State, have found that many patients suffer significant side effects from pain medication including lethargy, increased sensitivity to pain, potentially fatal overdoses, and the severely increased risk of addiction.

The new regulations would require a doctor to refer patients to a pain specialist for review when their daily dosage increases to a specific level and no improvement is shown. The specialist will determine the next step for the patient, such as reducing pain medication, physical therapy, or in instances of substance abuse, helping patients find necessary treatment.

 

Docs on Drugs

A 2010 study by the Harvard Medical School found that a stunning 17 percent of doctors practicing in the U.S. knew of an impaired or incompetent physician due to drugs or alcohol in their workplace. And one-third of those doctors failed to report a fellow physician to authorities such as hospital officials or state medical boards, putting patients unknowingly at risk. The study’s findings will be published in the American Medical Association.

The study found that many failed to report fellow colleagues suffering from substance abuse because they assumed someone else would handle the situation, that nothing would happen if they reported it, or that they could be targeted for retribution. And though programs are in place for retraining, intervention and getting doctors into treatment, the study shows that many do not have faith in the current system.

Some specialists say that better protection is needed for whistleblowers as well as more education on how to report an addicted colleague. “The American Medical Association and other professional groups say doctors have an ethical obligation to make such reports. And many states require doctors to tell authorities about colleagues who endanger patients because of alcoholism, drug abuse or mental illness.” (MSNBC)

A doctor who runs a North Carolina substance abuse program, which deals largely with the state medical society and state disciplinary board, said that about 200 doctors a year are referred to him for alcoholism, drug addiction, anger-management problems and depression. And, according to the doctor, ninety percent of addicted doctors who’ve been through his program remain sober five years after treatment.

In fact, most states have programs that are designed to not only get doctors into treatment but to also advice physicians on how to intervene with a colleague. And often, the reporting of a fellow physician can remain anonymous. However, the systems in place on paper may seem easily applicable, but hospital and practice politics, loyalties and denial at times can make it very difficult for a single physician to report a troubled colleague.

This problem puts too many lives at risk. When a doctor boasts about his program keeping ninety percent of doctors sober for five years, we begin to see how crucial it is to increase the success rate of recovery. This is another example of how all the components of addiction need to be addressed in rehabilitation; the physical, psychological, behavioral, and social. That the most comprehensive care needed is individualized and multi-pronged.

“Moderate Drinking” Definition is Potentially Dangerous

The 2010 revised alcohol section of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee report included some alarming changes. The guidelines would radically alter the definition of “moderate drinking” by increasing the daily consumption suitable for men and women, despite lack of randomized studies on the health effects of alcohol consumption. Many addiction specialist are protesting this potentially dangerous public health message.

Previous Dietary Guidelines for alcohol consumption outlines the “safest” amount being two drinks per day for men and one drink per day for women. The 2010 Advisory report proposed guidelines based on average, rather than daily, consumption. And the report defined “moderate” (a.k.a. “safe”) drinking as up to four drinks per day for men and three drinks per day for women (so long as the average limits are not exceeded: 3 days a week or less).

However, specialists worry that by relaxing these guidelines some may increase their drinking to these new levels (doubling daily intake for men and tripling it for women), and find the new guidelines to be neither safe nor desirable from a public health perspective. Currently, four drinks for men and three drinks for women fall just short of amount defined as “binge” drinking. However, epidemiologic studies have found an increased risk for unintentional injuries (car crashes) as well as chronic diseases and substance abuse with these levels of drinking. This is especially true for women. We’ve posted before on this blog the dangers that alcohol pose for women. Click here to read how that second glass of wine can actually have the adverse effects of the first one.

With no evidence supporting that 4/3 drinking guidelines are safer than 2/1, many find these proposed guidelines to be ill-advised with the possibility for adverse social consequences. And they are encouraging those in the drug and alcohol field to speak up against these changes.

Ending Discrimination Against Addiction

People with drug or alcohol addiction problems often face severe discrimination (both publicly and privately) that restricts their access to necessary health care, employment, benefits, and discourages them from seeking treatment (which is both detrimental to the addict as well as costing society millions of dollars). Because of this, Join Together, a project of Boston University’s School of Public Health, formed a national panel to address this situation. As a result the panel outlined two guiding principals and ten recommendations if an effort to end this discrimination.

The first principle included the notion that addiction to drugs or alcohol is a treatable, chronic disease that needs to be seen and addressed as a public health issue. This means that those suffering from addiction need to be allowed to receive necessary treatment and recovery support to the extent of other chronic illnesses. The second principle established is that people seeking treatment or recovery from the disease of addiction should not be at risk of legally imposed bands or other barriers based solely on their addiction. Such as someone being repeatedly punished for the same offense.

In light of these two principles, the following recommendations were made.

  • Insurance coverage for addiction treatment needs to be available at the extent it is for other illnesses.
  • Insurance companies should not be able to deny claims to injury that occurs while someone suffering from addiction is under the influence.
  • Treatment for addiction needs to be personalized to each patient and based on the best scientific protocols and standards of care and including services that significantly enhance the likelihood of success. This may include a variety of treatment options including Neurotransmitter Restoration, behavioral therapies, and more. There are many different type of treatments for addiction, and no single treatment is right for every individual. The “one size fits all” treatment model is outdated and ineffective.
  • Employees who voluntarily seek treatment for substance abuse should not be at risk for discriminatory actions or dismissal from employment. It was estimated in 2000 that 70 percent of people who needed treatment were employed.
  • It’s estimated that 75 percent of people who admit to a prospective employer that he or she is in recovery, will not get the job. This admission should not be a consideration unless relevant to the job.
  • People in recovery with prior drug convictions should not face obstacles in getting student loans, grants, scholarships, or access to government training programs.
  • People in recovery with non-violent drug convictions should not be subject to bans on food stamps and cash assistance.
  • Public Housing agencies should use the discretion afforded them by law to help people find treatment instead of barring them and their families from housing.
  • People who are disabled as a result of their addiction disease should be eligible for Social Security Disability Income and Supplemental Security Income.
  • Decision regarding custodial cases should be made in the best interest of the child based on what is happening at home, and not solely on the presumption that a positive drug test automatically means neglect or abuse.

This report sheds some interesting light on a difficult matter at hand and offers hope for change in the future.

4th of July Weekend and Underage Drinking

According to a recent study released by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), hospital emergency visits dealing with underage drinking nearly double during the 4th of July Holiday weekend. The number of underage drinking-related visits to the emergency room are 87 percent higher this weekend than any other day in July.

In light of this information, SAMHSA reiterates the importance of reminding youth that underage drinking is not a harmless right of passage. It can have serious consequences with the potential of harming oneself, another, or even death. Because parents are the frontline force in preventing underage drinking, they are a key element in the prevention of underage alcohol use. It’s important to also remember that the earlier a teen begins drinking, the more they are at risk for developing substance abuse problems later in life. In fact, more than 4 out of ten people who begin drinking before the age of 15, develop substance abuse problems.

According to reports, 40 percent of kids have tried alcohol by the time they reach the eighth grade. It’s important for parents to remember three rules of frontline prevention (SAMHSA): talk early, talk often, and get others involved.

Talk Early: 70 percent of kids say their parents are the reason they don’t drink. Talk to your kids about the health and safety risk of drinking when young. It’s also important to get your kids talking to you. Find out what your kids social influences are, so you can help them build defenses.

Talk Often: One conversation isn’t enough to fully explain the dangers of alcohol at such a young age, or to help your child build the tools to be able to say no. By making it a regular topic of discussion, a child will feel more comfortable about talking with a parent about underage drinking.

Get Others Involved: More than 70 percent of eight graders said that alcohol was easy to get from family or friends. And though parents are the frontline, it’s important that they recruit others to be active and positive role models in their child’s life. Talk to other family members, the school, other parents, peers, and community members. Make sure to let them know where you stand on underage drinking. Share the facts with them!
Have a safe and sunny 4th of July!

Page 40 of 49« First...102030...3839404142...Last »

Receive Updates

Privacy Policy

All inquiries are held in the strictest confidence. Let us help you find the program that's right for you. Please call or email us TODAY!

No information on this site is intended to replace that of your physician or medical care provider.

Contact Information

ExecuCare
Advanced Recovery Center
1100 Poydras Street, Suite 2900
New Orleans, LA 70163
Main: 770.817.0711
Fax: 770.817.0640